grayson county district courtgrayson county district court

The dispute went through all instances in Germany. 72, 60435 Frankfurt a. Contract | 05/26/2016, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | such as federal, state, district, superior, criminal, common, circuit, judicial, judiciary, divorce, appeals, family, traffic, and small claims courts. } The Grayson County District Court, located in Leitchfield, Kentucky is a government institution where legal disputes are resolved in accordance with the law. Contract Property We strive to provide accurate information, however, Courtreference.com is not an official source of information for any court or court clerk. Is any of the above incorrect? Other A Ukranian and a German company entered into a sales agreement containing an arbitration clause providing for arbitration before the International Court of Arbitration of the Zurich Chamber of Commerce. It concluded that since all three arbitration clauses were valid, the Buyers counterclaims were inadmissible based on the application by analogy of Section 1032(1) of the German Civil Procedure Code. It held that the right to be heard as a basic principle laid down in the German Constitution (Article 103(1) Grundgesetz) also applies to arbitration. Contract Let us know here, 15th District Court200 S Crockett, Ste 217A0.0 mile away, Grayson County Court at Law No 1200 S Crockett0.0 mile away, 2023 Everything-Bytes | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. The California Court adopted the factual findings and the legal considerations underlying the arbitral award, thus incorporating the award in its judgment. Elections. The Seller argued that the counterclaims were inadmissible in the proceedings because the three contracts which formed the basis for the Buyers counterclaims all contained arbitration clauses. | 06/24/2016, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: REEVES, CRYSTAL; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA INC, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | A Ukranian and a German company entered into a sales agreement containing an arbitration clause providing for arbitration before the International Court of Arbitration of the Zurich Chamber of Commerce. Germany / 12 October 2009 / Oberlandesgericht Mnchen / 34 Sch 20/08. The Defendant alleged that in the course of the proceedings, the Parties agreed to payment by installments. Needing bullpen help with their elite offense and rotation, the Texas Rangers acquired Aroldis Chapman from the Kansas City Royals Friday. The MCC issued an award in the Claimant's favor on 1 February 2007. In addition, they also signed the Defendants Option Agreement and Approval Form, which contained an arbitration clause. Appeals from the Eastern District go to the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit . Forfeiture It reasoned that the arbitration agreement, thought not in writing for the purposes of the NYC, was valid under the formal requirements of German law, which applies pursuant to the more-favorable-right provision at Article VII(1) NYC. The Claimant's application for enforcement was granted by the Landgericht (Regional Court) Berlin in 2005. Although there was no written arbitration agreement within the meaning of Article II (2) NYC, the Court found that in light of the more-favorable-right provision at Article VII(1) NYC, the requirement of an arbitration agreement signed by both parties could be dispensed with. Second, with regard to Article V(1)(a) NYC, the Court did not accept the Buyer's argument pursuant to which there was no valid arbitration agreement. | 12/04/2019, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | This guide contains information on all the District Courts, Child Protection Courts, and the Grayson County Child Support (IV-D) Court. PARKS, JAMES, ET AL, 18-CI-00355MCALLISTER, MARION H. VS. COFFEY, MARINA , ET AL. In particular, the enforcement of an award of compensation for legal costs did not violate German public policy. Thus, the tribunal did not violate the Defendant's right to be heard. Search public court records from Grayson County General District Court online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, and more. Room:C. 20-CI-00114 RMI, INC. It considered that the arbitration clause contained in the contract signed by both parties was valid since it clearly met the formal requirements under Article II(2) NYC. California Privacy Notice: If you are a California resident, you have the right to know what personal information we collect, the purposes for which we use it, and your options to opt out of its sale. The Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Mnchen granted enforcement, finding that the Claimant had complied with the formal requirements for recognition under German law, which applied in virtue of the more-favorable-right provision at Article VII(1) NYC, by supplying a copy of the arbitral award certified by counsel. In 2008, the Claimant commenced arbitration before a sole arbitrator. Following a dispute on the stallion's ability to serve as a dressage and breeding horse, the Buyer initiated ICC proceedings, aimed at annulling the contract and obtaining damages based on alleged deficiencies of the stallion. Directions. The Defendant objected to the jurisdiction of the German court, arguing, inter alia, that the dispute should be referred to arbitration based on the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties. The Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court Berlin) granted enforcement. else { . Other | 07/25/2016, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: HORTON, DAVID MARK; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: SHINAULT, RICHARD FRANKLIN, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The issue that was dealt with throughout the proceedings before the courts was that a provision of German law foresees that the NY Convention alone applies to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards ( 1061 of the German Code of Civil Procedure). Grayson County Judicial Center 500 Carroll Gibson Blvd. Search the Kentucky Revised Statutes by keyword, or browse by table of contents. View and download a Kentucky Bar Association complaint form for lawyer misconduct, with instructions for filing a complaint. Contract View and download forms and form packets for use in Parker County District . Main, Germany. 11 July 2011. | 12/29/2017, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: BULLIONS, TINA RENEE; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: BULLIONS, TINA RENEE, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Search results include case number, case title, hearing type, courtroom, and time. We hope this site meets your needs and that you enjoy it. Shortly therafter, the parties entered into a supplementary agreement providing for arbitration before the Ukranian Chamber of Industry and Commerce in Kiev. NO/EXPIRED REGISTRATION PLATES. | 09/15/2021, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE C; PLAINTIFF: COMMONWEALTH OF VA, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | | 11/21/2017, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The settlement agreement provided for arbitration in Zurich under the DIS (German Institution of Arbitration) Rules. Grayson County Welcome to Grayson County, Texas, located just 60 miles north of Dallas in the North Texas region. The Claimants subsequently terminated the brokerage agreements and raised tort claims before the Landgericht (Regional Court) Duesseldorf. If 138 BGB as such is certainly part of German domestic public order as it annuls contracts that violate public morality, this cannot mean however that the entire domestic case law on 138 BGB with all its variations is also part of the domestic public order. VS. CITY OF LEITCHFIELD, KENTUCKY, E. . Property The Buyer opposed enforcement and raised certain counterclaims in the enforcement proceedings. The Claimants further asserted that the tribunal's assessment of the evidence was correct and would not amount to a violation of German "ordre public", in any event. The court address is 200 S Crockett St, #120A, Sherman TX 75090. var custom_type_str = ""; var custom_status_str = ""; var closing_per_page = "20"; //WD-2023 (Carroll County) 1st, 2nd, 3rd, & 4th Wednesdays, 10:00 a.m. (Grayson County) Bad Checks 2nd Wednesday, 1:30 p.m. No Court will be held on the 5th Wednesday of a month. View instructions for obtaining criminal record reports from the Administrative Office of the Courts. Even more, said the Court, the invalidity of the main contract has no effect whatsoever on the validity of the arbitration agreement. Juvenile & Domestic . It concluded that this was not the case for any of the public policy violations raised by the Respondent. The Court further reasoned that even if one were to accept the objection as being in principle admissible, the result would not be any different. The fact that Spanish was used in the arbitration (rather than English) did not contravene the Parties' agreement, because they also agreed to the application of the MCC rules which provide for proceedings in Spanish. } | 03/31/2017, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Claimants sought enforcement in Germany. NO/EXPIRED KENTUCKY REGISTRATION RECEIPT. The Butler County Sheriffs Office and Kentucky State Police responded to the accident in the 2000 block of Brooklyn Chapel Road, The identity of the man killed on the Western Kentucky Parkway Thursday afternoon has been released. | 12/20/2017, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: DOLLINGER, ALICE TURNER; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: INDIAN PATH MEDICAL CENTER, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: ANDERSON, JAMES L.; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NA, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Parties thereafter signed an Acknowledgement of Debt. The Bundesgerichtshof added that it confirmed the view previously expressed by the Oberlandesgericht that under German law, a foreign broker - together with a German broker - will be held to have deliberately inflicted intentional damage on German consumers/investors, thereby offending good morality, when the foreign broker consciously and blatantly grants the German broker full and uncontrolled access to foreign stock exchanges without previously controlling the latter's business plan. The Oberlandesgericht Mnchen (Higher Regional Court Munich) granted enforcement, finding that the Claimant had complied with the formal conditions for recognition and enforcement under German law (which applied in virtue of the more-favorable-right rule under Article VII(1) NYC) by supplying the original arbitral award with a translation. Contract The Bundesgerichtshof reasoned that the contracts containing the relevant arbitration agreements were consumer contracts under German law and hence, under Section 1031(5) of the German Civil Procedure Code, subject to the more strict form requirements for arbitration agreements involving consumers. In paper work filed Dec. 22, District Attorney Brett Smith has asked someone else . Moreover, the Court did not find the agreement to constitute a collusion under Ukranian law applicable to that question. Contract Germany / 01 September 2009 / Germany, Oberlandesgericht Mnchen / 34 Sch 14/09. The Bundesgerichtshof considered that a certain number of factual assessments still needed to be carried out before a final finding was possible in this case and sent the case back to the Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Dsseldorf for reassessment. Forms may also be downloaded and filled out by hand. Nor did the language of the proceedings violate due process, as the Defendant failed to show that this prevented the presentation of its case. jQuery("#aws_ec_insertEC_alertIMG_1").hide(); The Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court) confirmed the decision of the Oberlandesgericht. The Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Mnchen declared the award enforceable. View information about the Kentucky State Law Library, including location, hours, and available materials and services. The Parties' U.S. parent company concluded a sales contract in 2003, which contained an arbitration clause. | 10/06/2016, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Oberlandesgericht also found that, in any event, the Respondents objections against enforcement were unfounded. | 05/24/2018, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | | 12/08/2020, JUDGMENT: PLAINTIFF; PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $1,500.00; INTEREST AWARD: 6%; IS JUDGMENT SATISFIED: YES; DATE SATISFACTION FILED: 05/17/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | HOOD, MALACHI OBEDIAH, 22-T-00758COMMONWEALTH VS. KING, CHARLES C, 22-T-00842COMMONWEALTH VS. DENNIS, CHAD MATTHEW, 22-T-00881COMMONWEALTH VS. LACEFIELD, DANIEL B, 22-T-00898COMMONWEALTH VS. ANDERSON, SHERYL LYNN, 22-T-00943COMMONWEALTH VS. FISHER, JOHN A, 22-T-00952COMMONWEALTH VS. HAWKINS, JAKE O, 22-T-00989COMMONWEALTH VS. HUMPHREY, MICHAEL S, 22-T-00998COMMONWEALTH VS. SCHOENLAUB, DANIEL K, 22-T-01035COMMONWEALTH VS. PATRICK, MELISSA ROSERAE, 20-M-00498COMMONWEALTH VS. HACK, DAMON S, (SHOW CAUSE DEFERRED/INSTALLMENT PAYMENT ), 20-M-00603COMMONWEALTH VS. BROWN, SIERRA DAWN, 21-M-00391COMMONWEALTH VS. NANCE, JUSTIN R, 21-M-00445COMMONWEALTH VS. GOLDSMITH, JOSEPH EDWIN, 21-T-00129COMMONWEALTH VS. MULLINS, MICHAEL B, 21-T-00326COMMONWEALTH VS. SCHMIERER, THOMAS M, 21-T-00646COMMONWEALTH VS. SCHMIERER, THOMAS M, 21-T-00731COMMONWEALTH VS. DUNCAN, DENITRA LATRICE, 22-M-00009COMMONWEALTH VS. CLARK, JORDAN C, 22-M-00112COMMONWEALTH VS. VAUGHN, CLAUDIA RAY, 22-M-00132COMMONWEALTH VS. HOLSCHUH, DWANE RANDALL, 22-M-00138COMMONWEALTH VS. HOLSCHUH, DWANE RANDALL, 22-M-00265COMMONWEALTH VS. SCOTT, JEFFERY, 22-T-00042COMMONWEALTH VS. HUNT, CHARLES BRANDON, 22-T-00068COMMONWEALTH VS. STEWART, DAVID CLINTON, 22-T-00248COMMONWEALTH VS. SALMON, THOMAS JOSEPH, 22-T-00304COMMONWEALTH VS. JUMP, SHELBY LYNN, 22-T-00454COMMONWEALTH VS. JOHNSON, CHASITY, 22-T-00498COMMONWEALTH VS. SCHMIERER, THOMAS, 22-F-00256COMMONWEALTH VS. BROWNING, LINDA SUE, 22-F-00257COMMONWEALTH VS. HALE, ALLEN WAYNE DAVIS, 22-F-00259COMMONWEALTH VS. ARNSPERGER, AARON, 22-F-00260COMMONWEALTH VS. PAYTON, JEFFREY A, 22-M-00313COMMONWEALTH VS. BELL, KRISTIE M, 22-M-00396COMMONWEALTH VS. HAYCRAFT, DUSTIN, 22-M-00397COMMONWEALTH VS. REYNOLDS-BARLEY, AMANDA, 22-M-00400COMMONWEALTH VS. Germany / 11 May 2009 / Oberlandesgericht Mnchen / 34 Sch 23/08. The Defendant asserted that the arbitral tribunal which lacked proper expert knowledge, had violated its right to be heard by following the Claimants' expert valuation without itself assessing the question by application of a proper valuation method, without appointing an expert and without adressing the Defendant's expert report. | 08/22/2016, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: FARMER, CHRISTY; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: FINNEY, DAVID & JOYCEH, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: SHEETS, JASON; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: TROY CAPITAL LLC, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | In 2007, the employees of both Parties discussed further deliveries under the contract. | 10/09/2020, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Northern Kentucky Bar Association offers an online lawyer referral service that covers all counties. | 12/05/2017, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | Therefore, the public order exception applies only to cases where fundamental and indispensable values of the German legal order needs to be protected. Use Trellis.law to access Grayson County District Court Criminal cases - or use Trellis.law to search personal, commercial, probate, and other cases in Grayson County, Texas. Grayson County 59th District Court Livestream of Public Zoom Hearings. 20-T-00469COMMONWEALTH VS. YADEN, JASON EDWARD, 21-D-00096-001PROBUS, LYNDA KEVIN VS. PROBUS, BILLY JOE, 21-T-00441COMMONWEALTH VS. PIERCY, TIMOTHY SCOTT JR, 21-T-00772COMMONWEALTH VS. DURBIN, ANTHONY CURTIS, 21-T-01110COMMONWEALTH VS. COLVIN, BRENNAN DANIEL, 22-D-00002-002SALTSMAN, KATELYN VS. CORBIN, TYLER W, 22-D-00038-001HAYES COLE, JENNIFER ANN VS. VALASKY, LARRY, 22-D-00065-001ALVEY, CAROLICIA FRANCES VS. ALVEY, SAMANTHA M, 22-D-00067-001MILAM, TIFFANY VS. WALLING, DAVID, 22-D-00069-001PROBUS, SHAWN VS. LINDSEY, CASSANDRA, 22-D-00077-001SMITH, MICHAEL VS. CARNES, MEGAN, 22-D-00079-001FULKERSON, KAYSIE VS. SHARTZER, NETHANIEL, 22-D-00085-001WHITE, WHITNEY VS. LESLIE, COTY, 22-D-00088-001HOLSCHUH, MELISSA ELAINE VS. POOLE, CHRISTIAN CHEYENNE, 22-D-00089-001HOLDERMAN, KATRINA S VS. COATES, RANDALL R, 22-D-00091-001COLLETT, TABITHA KATHERINE VS. HOSKINS, MICHAEL W, 22-D-00092-001WELLS, LARAH VS. WELLS, TIMOTHY, 22-F-00234COMMONWEALTH VS. LOGSDON, DEWAYNE W, 22-F-00237COMMONWEALTH VS. DUFF, EDWIN T, 22-F-00239COMMONWEALTH VS. DAVIDSON, DESTANY ANN, 22-F-00241COMMONWEALTH VS. PATRICK, MELISSA ROSERAE, 22-F-00242COMMONWEALTH VS. PATRICK, MELISSA ROSERAE, 22-F-00248COMMONWEALTH VS. KRAHWINKEL, RUSSELL H, 22-F-00250COMMONWEALTH VS. CRANE, GLYNDON I, 22-F-00251COMMONWEALTH VS. HUMPHREY, TOMMIE, 22-F-00252COMMONWEALTH VS. The Buyer, in contrast, argued that the arbitration clauses in two of the contracts were invalid since they had only been signed by the Buyer but not by the Seller. Jury Duty, District and County Clerk of Court, Phone Number, and other Grayson County info. Nor was there a violation of due process that could constitute grounds for non-enforcement under either Article V(1)(b) or V(2)(b) NYC. Forfeiture The Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court Berlin) affirmed the decision in June 2006, reasoning that the confirmation decision adopted the factual findings and legal conclusions of the award and made them their own. BONE, CASSANDRA ARDEN, 19-T-01574COMMONWEALTH VS. MCKENZIE, APRIL, 22-D-00090-001WHITWORTH, ANDREW VS. WHITWORTH, HEATHER, 20-T-00464COMMONWEALTH VS. CRABLE, STEVEN WAYNE, 21-M-00232COMMONWEALTH VS. BENTKOWSKI, GERARD EDWARD, 21-M-00233COMMONWEALTH VS. BENTKOWSKI, GERARD E, 21-M-00334COMMONWEALTH VS. AUSTIN, DARRICK LEE, 21-M-00454COMMONWEALTH VS. HEFLIN, KENNY J, 21-M-00494COMMONWEALTH VS. NUNAMAKER, PHILIP DONALD, 21-T-00885COMMONWEALTH VS. CRABLE, STEVEN WAYNE, 21-T-01030COMMONWEALTH VS. CRABLE, STEVEN W, 22-F-00130COMMONWEALTH VS. GOFF, DANNY LEE, 22-M-00068COMMONWEALTH VS. JOHNSON, RONNY R, 22-M-00263COMMONWEALTH VS. A party sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award in Germany. It held that the decision was not a declaration of enforceability but rather an independent order and could be declared enforceable in its own right. UniCourt uses cookies to improve your online experience, for more information please see our Privacy Policy. Visit our Links Page for websites providing Employment Listings, as well as US Government holiday closings. In order to oppose enforcement, the Buyer asserted that the sales price agreed upon had been too high in light of the stallion's actual deficiencie and requested the Court to find that this price gap constituted a violation of the domestic public order which made the contract void in accordance to 138 BGB (German Civil Code). | 08/02/2017, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | With regard to the alleged violation of Articles V(1)(b), V(2)(b) and V(1)(d) NYC, the Oberlandesgericht found that in the case at hand, the arbitral tribunal did consider the question of the property's value, and discussed in detail which expert's view should prevail. jQuery("#aws_ec_insertEC_alertIMG_0").hide(); 19-CI-00142VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC. A downloadable complaint form is included. Contract The Oberlandesgericht Saarbrcken granted enforcement. Thus, the question arose whether German law could accept the reference made back to German domestic arbitration law by Article VII(1) NYC for the requirement of an "agreement in writing" set out in Article II(2) NYC. Search court cases for free, read the case summary, find docket information, download court documents, track case status, and get alerts when cases are updated. | 05/02/2019, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | It concluded that the arbitration agreements did not meet these requirements since, inter alia, they had not been signed by both parties. } The Parties concluded an agreement referring disputes relating to the bill to the Arbitration Court of the Czech Chamber of Commerce, to be governed by Czech law. The Kammergericht granted enforcement without hearing the Buyers counterclaims, finding that the arbitration clauses in all of the three contracts were valid. if (count_closing <= 0) { | 06/13/2023, P. O. Germany / 05 June 2009 / Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe / 14 Sch 03/09. The Defendant opened individual investment transaction accounts for each of the Claimants. Contract Grayson County Detention Center Address. Germany / 27 August 2009 / Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt / 26 SchH 03/09. A New York Times columnist wrote that death is one way student loan borrowers could get out of paying for their debts in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision. GRAYSON County CIRCUIT Court Docket for 12/13/2022 Courtroom: ALL Subdivision: ALL NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCKET - SUBJECT TO CHANGE Room:C 09:00 AM 09-CI-00221 GARY, MARTHA RAY VS. GARY, DANIEL DEPRESTO (MOTION HOUR) 12-CI-00029 CRAIG, PEARL R VS. . A Czech Seller of sugar sought enforcement in Germany before the Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court Berlin) of an arbitration award rendered against a German Buyer, following an arbitration in London under the arbitration rules of the Refined Sugar Association (RSA). Name: Landesbridgeverband Hessen, The visualizations for "Landesbridgeverband Hessen, Frankfurt a. 5 stars 4 stars 3 stars 2 stars 1 star. A man was killed after being struck on the Western Kentucky Parkway between Leitchfield and Caneyville. 19-CI-00074MATTINGLY, SHANNON VS. MATTINGLY, JAMIE D. 19-CI-00084BRATCHER-ROSSIO, TRENA M. VS. BRATCHER-ROSSIO, SARA JENAE, 19-CI-00092AUBREY, SAMANTHA JO VS. HENNING, NICHOLAS RYAN. jQuery("#aws_ec_insertEC_alertIMG_0").show(); 2, 60313 Frankfurt am Main 0km. In Leitchfield Criminal Courts, the government brings a case against a defendant who is accused of breaking the law. No legal advice is offered here and this site is not an alternative to competent legal counsel. However, substantive objections are not admissible if the causes on which they are based already existed during the arbitration proceedings. District Court is the court of limited jurisdiction and handles juvenile matters, city and county ordinances, misdemeanors, violations, traffic offenses, probate of wills, arraignments, felony probable cause hearings, small claims involving $2,500 or less, civil cases involving $5,000 or less, voluntary and involuntary mental commitments and cases relating to domestic violence and abuse. County court Landgericht Frankfurt am Main. Instructions and additional self-help resources are provided. | 07/11/2017, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | The Claimant had obtained a favourable arbitration award following arbitration proceedings at the International Chamber of Commerce in San Diego, which granted it certain insolvency creditor claims against the Respondent. We thank you for visiting. The fact that the Defendant did not attend the hearing did not violate due process or public policy, since it had expressly informed the arbitrator that it would not attend and was fully informed of the proceedings. Property VS. BATCHELDER, TUROC, 19-CI-00188GRAHAM, LEA ANN VS. GRAHAM, LESLIE OMAR, 19-CI-00202LINDSEY, LEANDRA VS. LINDSEY, CHRISTOPHER, 19-CI-00260ESTATE OF PATRICIA ANN WEASE, ET AL VS. JACKSON NATIONAL LIF, 19-CI-00304FORT KNOX FEDERAL CREDIT UNION VS. LEWIS, ELIZABETH, 19-CI-00377STEELE, STEVEN VS. STEELE, LORI, 20-CI-00017GOFF, KATHRYN D VS. GOFF, PHILLIP RAY, 20-CI-00260ACCELERATED INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. DAVIS, DEBBIE, 20-CI-00269NANCE, THOMAS WAYNE , ET AL VS. STONE, EDDIE A. , ET AL, 20-CI-00277POOLE, JAMES JR VS. Contract 15th District Court in Sherman, TX - Court Information County-Courthouse .com The Parties entered into an exclusive distribution contract in February 2001, which expired on 31 December 2010. Search Local Rules of Practice for Circuit Courts and District Courts by circuit or district, rule type, and county. 200 S Crockett, Ste 231A, Sherman, TX75090-7168 var myObj_closing = JSON.parse(data); var count_closing = myObj_closing.count; | 05/25/2016, SERVICE/PROCESS; PERSON SERVED: BEEMAN, KYRA; PROCESS TYPE: NOTICE OF HEARING DATE; PLAINTIFF: ABC INVESTMENT CO, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | It held that under the applicable Swedish law there was no valid arbitration agreement between the Swedish parent company and the German company. The Claimant appealed that decision. It reasoned that the Buyer, by supplying a copy of the award certified by counsel, had complied with the less strict formal requirements of German law, which applied in virtue of the more-favorable-right rule under Article VII(1) NYC. A multitude of forms were sent by that broker to the German claimants, some of which contained (contradictory) arbitration agreements, and none of which yet had been signed by both Parties. Applicable NYC Provisions. The Parties entered into a sales contract in October 2006. | 01/12/2021, Grayson County Courts | Grayson County General District Court | View and download Grayson County District Court forms including child support, adoption, copy request, and family law information sheet. Therefore, even though the Defendant did not take recourse before the appellate body of the CAIFL or the French courts, it was not precluded from arguing that the tribunal lacked competence. Mainz is the capital and largest city. [1] The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has jurisdiction in Grayson County. 15th District Court Coordinator Phone: (903) 813-4200 x4303 Email: Deborah Whitney 59th District Court Coordinator Phone: (903) 813-4200 x4305 . Contract Other Other If any of these apply to you, contact the court to verify they observe the exemption. POWERS, THOMAS, 22-F-00253COMMONWEALTH VS. LOGSDON, CHARLES WINFORD, 22-F-00254COMMONWEALTH VS. NUNN, TRISTAN D. A Morgantown man and his young daughter were killed when a tree fell on their vehicle. However, an award was rendered in favor of the Vendor ordering the Buyer to pay the outstanding part of the sales price. Contract A proven violation of German domestic public order would be such a case. In 2007, the Seller commenced arbitration at the SCC seeking damages for breach of contract. Forfeiture The Claimant then sought enforcement in Germany. The Defendant appealed to the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court) on points of law, seeking a reversal of the Oberlandesgericht's decision and the reinstatement of the Landgerichts decision.